Truth Without Paradox
In Truth Without Paradox, David Johnson purports to solve several of the traditional problems of metaphysics, pertaining to truth, logic, similitude, morality, and God. In the first chapter, he argues (in three independent ways) against the general acceptability of the schema 'if p then it is true that p', claiming thereby to resolve the paradoxes of the liar and of the sorites. In the second chapter, he clarifies what was (and what was not) settled by Quine about "truth by convention." In the third chapter, he attempts to shed light on the obscure notion of "sameness," or "uniformity," especially in its application to inductive extrapolation and to the grue paradox. In the fourth chapter, he purports to solve the "Is/Ought" problem of moral philosophy. The fifth and final chapter, which will be of interest to philosophers of religion, contains what the author calls an historical proof of the existence of God, based on (among other things) a resolution of the lottery paradox.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
ON THE METAPHYSICS OF TRUTH ANIMADVERSIONS ON A SAYING OF ARISTOTLES
ON THE METAPHYSICS OF LOGIC CONVENTIONALISM ABOUT LOGICAL TRUTH
ON THE METAPHYSICS OF SIMILITUDE INDUCTION AND MODALITY
ON THE METAPHYSICS OF MORALITY THERE IS NOTHING HID FROM THE HEAT THEREOF
able accept according already application argument assert believe blue caused chapter Christian claim concerning consider conventions counterfactuals course discover Ehrman emeralds English ethical evidence examined example existence explicit expresses expresses a true fact false Feast fire Friday give given Gospel green grue gruesome Hence historical hour infer instance issue Jesus John kind knowledge laws least Liar is true linguistic logical truth look lose Mark matter mean metaphysical moonless moral nature necessary condition object obviously paradox paraskeue particular Passover pebble perhaps philosophers physical place my hand possible premises present Press principle priori probability problem putting question Quine reason refers regard regress relative relevant Sahara sapphire seems sense sentence simply sort statement suggestion suppose surely tell Testament thesis things ticket tion token true proposition understand universal utterance wrong