Page images
PDF
EPUB

duty, and he had discharged it with unflinching courage. He had kept his word to Hughes; he had done all that he could for him, even to offering his own chance of fame and fortune a sacrifice to him. Now he could do no more, and if he could not help being glad that the sacrifice had not been accepted of him, he was not to be blamed. He was very much to be praised, and he rewarded himself with a full recognition of his virtue; he imagined some words, few but rare, from Peace, expressing her sense of his magnanimity, when she came to know of it. He hoped that a fact so creditable to him, and so characteristic, would not escape the notice of his biographer. He wished that Hughes could know what he had done, and in his revery he contrived that his generous endeavor should be brought to the old man's knowledge; he had Hughes say that such an action was more to him than the publication of his book.

Throughout his transport of self-satisfaction there ran a nether torment of question whether Peace Hughes could possibly suppose that he was privy to that paragraphing about his book, and this finally worked to the surface, and became his whole mood. After his joy ful riot it was this that kept him awake till morning, that poisoned all his pleasure in his escape from self-sacrifice. He could only pacify himself and get some sleep at last by promising to stop at the publishers on his way down to the Every Evening office in the morning, and beseech her to believe that he had nothing to do with priming the press, and that he wished Mr. Brandreth had not told him of it. Nothing less than this was due him in the character that he desired to appear in hereafter.

He reached the publishers' office before Mr. Brandreth came down, and when he said he would like to see Miss Hughes, the clerk answered that Miss Hughes had sent word that her father was not so well, and she would not be down that day. "He's pretty low, I believe," the clerk volunteered.

"I'm afraid so," said Ray.

He asked if the clerk would call a messenger to take a note from him to his office, and when he had despatched it he went up to see Hughes.

"Did you get our message?" Peace asked him the first thing.

"No," said Ray. "What message?"

VOL. LXXXV.-No. 509.-75

[blocks in formation]

You must tell him the truth," said the girl, sadly.

66

Is that Mr. Ray?" Mrs. Denton called from the sick-room. "Come in, Mr. Ray. Father wants you."

"In a moment. Come here, Mrs. Denton," Ray called back.

She came out, and he told her what he had told Peace. She did not seem to see its bearing at once. When she realized it all, and had spent her quick wrath in denunciation of Mr. Brandreth's heartlessness, she said, desperately: "Well, you must come now. Perhaps it isn't his book; perhaps it's something else. But he wants you."

She had to rouse her father from the kind of torpor in which he lay like one dead. She made him understand who was there, and then he smiled, and turned his eyes appealingly toward Ray. "Put your ear as close to his lips as you can. He can't write any more. He wants to say something to you."

Ray stooped over and put his ear to the drawn lips. A few whiffs of inarticulate breath mocked the dying man's endeavor to speak. "I'm sorry; I can't catch a syllable," said Ray.

A mute despair showed itself in the old man's eyes.

"Look at me father!" cried Mrs. Denton. "Is it about your book?"

The faintest smile came over his face. "Did you wish to ask Mr. Ray if he would speak to Mr. Brandreth about it?" The smile dimly dawned again.

"Well, he has spoken to him. He went to see him last night, and he's come to tell you"-Ray shuddered and held

his breath-" to tell you that Mr. Brandreth will take your book, and he's going to publish it right away!"

Peace looked at her sister.

"I don't care!" said Mrs. Denton, passionately, dropping her voice. "You

A beatific joy lit up Hughes's face; and have your light, and I have mine." Ray drew a long breath.

[TO BE CONTINUED.]

SILENUS.

BY EDWARD A. UFFINGTON VALENTINE.

"Ho, Silenus!"

The dryads are calling,

The satyrs are bawling,
While red leaves are falling.

"Ho, Silenus!

Holloa, ho-0!"

Like glowing lava-streams the sumac crawls
Upon the mountain's granite walls;
And starting through the shade
The maples raid

The pine-trees' gloomy porches
With countless flaring torches,
Till through the air, like cinders flying,
The leaves drop dying;

The purple asters glow like gems
On woodland hems;

Half-shut in folds of tawny grass
The blue pool pictures in its glass
The swallows sweeping through the clouds
In twittering crowds;

The red fox strains his supple shoulders
To scale the bowlders

And taste the wild grapes' dangling crop;
The light-foot squirrels hop

Through rustling sedges

And bear the smooth white nuts to rocky ledges.
"Ho, Silenus!

Holloa, ho-o!"

Thus down the slope the chorus flings its voice,
And waits, impatient to rejoice

In all the Autumn's harvest pleasures,
And foot the measures

Timed to the tap of the nut on the ground—
Their chief not found.

"Ho, Silenus!

Holloa, ho-o!"

Down in the village by the cider-press,
The whole day long in idleness,
The orchard pillagers,

The sun-brown villagers,

Make merry 'round their final barrel
Of ruddy juice with dance and carol.
Silenus, thither strayed with wits half addled,
The cask has straddled,

And leads the music's jocund din
With foolish nodding chin,

[blocks in formation]

HE names of Beaumont and Fletcher worked in partnership, Jasper Mayne says

Tare as inseparably linked together truly that they are

as those of Castor and Pollux. They are the double stars of our poetical firmament, and their beams are so indissolubly mingled that it is in vain to attempt any division of them that shall assign to each his rightful share. So long as they

"both so knit That no man knows where to divide their wit, Much less their praise.” William Cartwright says of Fletcher, "That 'twas his happy fault to do too much; Who therefore wisely did submit each birth

* Copyright, 1892, by Charles Eliot Norton.

To knowing Beaumont, ere it did come forth, And made him the sobriety of his wit."

And Richard Brome also alludes to the copious ease of Fletcher, whom he had known:

"Of Fletcher and his works I speak. His works! says Momus, nay, his plays you'd say! Thou hast said right, for that to him was play Which was to others' brains a toil."

The general tradition seems to have been that Beaumont contributed the artistic judgment and Fletcher the fine frenzy. There is commonly a grain of truth in traditions of this kind. In the plays written by the two poets conjointly, we may find an intellectual entertainment in assigning this passage to one and that to the other, but we can seldom say decisively this is Beaumont's" or "that is Fletcher's," though we may find tolerably convincing arguments for it.

We have, it is true, some grounds on which we may safely form a conclusion as to the individual characteristics of Fletcher, because a majority of the plays which go under their joint names were written by him alone after Beaumont's death. In these I find a higher and graver poetical quality, and I think a riper grain of sentiment, than in any of the others. In running my eye along the margin, I observe that by far the greater number of the isolated phrases I have marked, whether for poetical force or felicity, but especially picturesqueness, or for weight of thought, belong to Fletcher. I should never suspect Beaumont's hand in such verses as these from Bonduca (a play wholly Fletcher's): "Ten years of bitter nights and heavy marches, When many a frozen storm sung through my cuirass,

And made it doubtful whether that or I Were the more stubborn metal." Where I come upon a picturesque passage in the joint plays, I am apt to think it Fletcher's: so too where there is a certain exhilaration and largeness of manner, and an ardor that charges its words with imagination as they go, or with an enthusiasm that comes very near it in its effect. Take this from the same play:

"The gods of Rome fight for ye; loud fame calls ye,

Pitched on the topless Apennine, and blows
To all the underworld, all nations, seas,
And unfrequented deserts where the
dwells,

snow

Wakens the ruined monuments, and there,
Where nothing but eternal death and sleep is,
Informs again the dead bones with your vir-
tues."

In short, I am inclined to think Fletcher the more poet of the two. Where there is pathos or humor, I am in doubt whether they belong to him or his partner, for I find these qualities both in the plays they wrote together and in those which are wholly his. In the expression of sentiment going far enough to excite a painless æsthetic sympathy, but stopping short of tragic passion, Beaumont is quite the equal of his friend. In the art of heightening and enriching such a sentiment by poetical associations and pictorial accessories, Fletcher seems to me the superior. Both, as I have said, have the art of being pathetic, and of conceiving pathetic situations; but neither of them had depth enough of character for that tragic pathos which is too terrible for tears; for those passionate convulsions when our human nature, like the sea in earthquake, is sucked away deep down from its habitual shores, leaving bare for a moment slimy beds stirring with loathsome life, and weedy tangles before undreamed of, and instantly hidden again under the rush of its reaction. Theirs are no sudden revelations, flashes out of the very tempest itself, and born of its own collisions; but much rather a melancholy Ovidian grace like that of the Heroic Epistles, conscious of itself, yet not so conscious as to beget distrust, and make us feel as if we had been cheated of our tenderness. If they ope the sacred source of sympathetic tears, it is not without due warning and ceremonious preparation. I do not mean to say that their sentiment is not real because it is pensive, and not passionate. It is real, but it is never heart-rending. I say it all in saying that their region is that of fancy. and imagination may be of one substance, as the northern lights and lightning are supposed to be; but the one plays and flickers in harmless flashes and streamers over the vault of the brain, the other condenses all its thought-executing fires into a single stab of flame. their humor. It is playful, intellectual, elaborate, like that of Charles Lamb when he trifles with it, pleasing itself with artificial dislocations of thought, and never glancing at those essential incongruities in the nature of things at sight of which

Fancy

And so of

humor shakes its bells, and mocks that it not sometimes show an almost tragic may not shudder.

Their comedies are amusing, and one of them, Wit without Money, is excellent, with some scenes of joyous fun in it that are very cheering. The fourth scene of the third act is a masterpiece of fanciful extravagance. This is probably Fletcher's. The Rev. W. Cartwright preferred Fletcher's wit to Shakespeare's.

power, as he constantly does tragic sensibility. There are glimpses of it in Thierry and Theodoret, and in the deathscene of the little Hengo in Bonduca. Perhaps I should rather say that he can conceive a situation with some true elements of tragedy, though not of the deepest tragedy, in it; but when he comes to work it out, and make it visible to us in

"Shakespeare to thee was dull: whose best jest words, he seems to feel himself more at

lies

I' th' ladies' questions and the fools' replies.
Nature was all his art; thy vein was free
As his, but without his scurrility."

Posterity has taken leave to differ with the Rev. W. Cartwright. The conversations in Fletcher's comedies are often lively, but the wit is generally a gentlemanlike banter; that is, what was gentlemanlike in that day. Real wit keeps; real humor is of the same nature in Aristophanes and Mark Twain; but nothing grows mouldy so soon as mere fun, the product of animal spirits. Fletcher had far more of this than of true humor. Both he and Beaumont were skilled in that pleasantry which is the agreeable substitute for the more trenchant article in good society. There is an instance of this in Miramont's commendation of Greek in the Elder Brother.

"Though I can speak no Greek, I love the sound
on't;

It goes so thundering as it conjured devils;
Charles speaks it loftily, and, if thou wert a man,
Or had'st but ever heard of Homer's Iliads,
Hesiod and the Greek poets, thou would'st run
mad,

And hang thyself for joy thou'dst such a gen-
tleman

To be thy son.
To me!"

O, he has read such things

"And do you understand 'em, brother?" "I tell thee no; that's not material; the sound's

Sufficient to confirm an honest man."

The speech of Lucio in the Woman hater has a smack of Molière in it.

[ocr errors]

'Secretary, fetch the gown I used to read petitions in, and the standish I answer French letters with."

Many of the comedies are impersonations of what were then called humors, like the Little French Lawyer; and some, like the Knight of the Burning Pestle, mere farces. Nearly all have the merit of being lively and amusing, which, to one who has read many comedies, is saying a great deal.

home with the pity than the terror of it.
His pathos (and this is true of Beaumont
also) is mixed with a sweetness that grows
cloying. And it is always the author
who is speaking, and whom we hear. At
best he rises only to a simulated passion,
and that leads inevitably to declamation.
There is no pang in it, but rather the hazy
softness of remembered sorrow. Lear on
the heath, at parley with the elements,
makes all our pettier griefs contemptible,
and the sublime pathos of that scene
abides with us almost like a consolation.
It is not Shakespeare who speaks, but
Sorrow herself.

"I tax not you, you elements, with unkindness;
I never gave you kingdom, called you children;
You owe me no subscription: why then let fall
Your horrible pleasure; here I stand, your slave,
A poor, infirm, weak, and despis'd old man :-
But yet I call you servile ministers,
That have with two pernicious daughters join'd
Your high-engender'd battles 'gainst a head
So old and white as this."

What confidence of simplicity is this!
We call it Greek, but it is nature, and cos-
mopolitan as she. That white head and
Priam's-the one feebly defiant, the other
bent humbly over the murderous hand
of Achilles-are our sufficing epitomes
of desolate old age. There is no third.
Generally pity for ourselves mingles in-
sensibly with our pity for others, but
here what are we in the awful presence
of these unexampled woes? The sorrows
of Beaumont and Fletcher's personages
have almost as much charm as sadness in
them, and we think of the poet more than
of the sufferer. Yet his emotion is genu-
ine, and we feel it to be so even while we
feel also that it leaves his mind free to
think about it, and the dainty expression
he will give to it. Beaumont and Fletch-
er appeal to this self-pity of which I just
spoke by having the air of saying, “How
would you feel in a situation like this?"
I am not now speaking of their poetical

I do not mean to say that Fletcher does quality. That is constant and unfailing,

« PreviousContinue »