Corneille and Racine: Problems of Tragic Form
Corneille and Racine may seem like marble monuments of an unchanging typical classicism. Mr Pocock is concerned to show that each of these great dramatists was a living writer, struggling to create developing forms and that the rules of neo-classical decorum were a strait-jacket to them. We can see in their writings a hesitation between poetic drama which creates its own forms from within and naturalistic drama which opts for truth to common life and a medium. In an interesting and comprehensive examination of the two authors, Mr Pocock shows the range of Coneille's achievement, and explains that a good seal which had been dismissed as decadence or incompetence was the result of his casting about for new forms. A section on Racine shows him opting for a deepening mode of drama which rejects naturalism and is implicitly subversive of neo-classical rules.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
CORNEILLE AND THE CRITICS
s POLYEUCTE 6 CORNEILLES VERSE
CORNEILLE SOME CONCLUSIONS
APPROACHES TO TRAGEDY
IS THE DRAMATIC ART OF RACINE
Other editions - View all
accept action Andromaque Antiochus appear approach Athalie attempt attitude Auguste beginning Bérénice bien brings c'est century characters Cinna clear clearly coeur comes contemporary conventions Corneille Corneille's critics death demand difficulty discussion drama effect elements emotional emphasise example experience express fact fait feel Finally follows force give Hippolyte human ideas important interest j'ai kill later less lines look marry meaning method moral naturalism naturalistic neo-classical passage passion pattern perhaps Phèdre play plot poet poetic poetry political Pompée possible present qu'il question Racine Racine's realisation reason references reste Rodogune Rome sang scene seems sense seriousness Sertorius shows significance situation speech success Suréna theme Thésée Titus tone tout tragedy tragic true truth values verse vous