Works of Thomas Hill Green: Philosophical works

Front Cover
Longmans, Green, and Company, 1885 - Philosophy - 1734 pages

From inside the book

Contents

Yet reality involves complex ideas which are made by the mind
27
The confusion covered by use of particulars
33
Nor 2 from the process of change in the relations of the cor
35
PAGE
37
This is the real thing from which abstraction is supposed to start
40
Relation of cause has to be put into sensitive experience
57
How he accounts for the appearance of there being such
63
What Locke understood by essence
64
31
65
Locke not aware of the full effect of his own doctrine which
70
8
74
Only about qualities of matter as distinct from matter itself that
88
In this case general truth must be merely verbal
98
Fatal to the notion that mathematical truths though general
100
His equivocal use of antecedent
104
Two lines of thought in Locke between which a follower would
106
126
107
Two ways out of such difficulties
112
The world which is to prove an eternal God must be itself
114
32
115
Can it be applied to him figuratively in virtue of the indefi
118
Sense in which the self is truly real
124
But such real essence a creature of thought
127
Yes according to the true notion of the relation between thought
130
The esse of body is the percipi
137
Still he admits that space is constituted by a succession of feel
145
Traces of progress in his idealism
151
PAGE
152
But this order does not belong to or determine the matter
159
It only seems to do so by assuming the fiction it has to account
166
204
169
Could Hume consistently admit idea of relation at all?
174
Significance of this doctrine
182
He draws the line between certainty and probability at the same
187
230
190
What then?
193
If felt thing is no more than feeling how can it have qualities?
200
In his account of the idea as abstract Hume really introduces
211
Idea of time even more unaccountable on Humes principles
217
Distinction between Humes doctrine and that of the hypothetical
221
Quantity made up of impressions and there must be a least
224
Are these several fictions really different from each other? 260
260
Their true correlativity
266
314
267
451
270
Hume evades this question still he is a long way off the Induc
272
Reality of the former system other than vivacity of impressions
280
Nor does this merely mean that it cannot constitute new pheno
286
Causality of spirit treated in the same
292
71
302
It is desire for pleasure in general
303
Objections to the Utilitarian answer to these questions
312
But what is to be said of actions which we only do because
318
Hume has to derive from impressions the objects which Locke
320
Of moral goodness Butlers account is circular
327
All desire is for pleasure
333
34
336
Humes account of sympathy
339
40
343
PAGE
346
If all good is pleasure what is moral good?
354
As real existence the simple idea carries with it invented
360
61
366
THEIR
373
A relation between subject and object is the datum of Mr Spen
385
Only like Locke by confusing feeling of touch with the judg
394
Correlativity of cause and substance
396
Thus his matter is no more independent than his mind
400
A sensation can have no parts or related elements which a per
414
Is then the perceived real thing identical with the conceived
420
Lockes answer
422
Mr Spencers doctrine of the independence of matter as either
433
Unless as by Mr Spencer it is already implied in them
439
65
442
2233
449
And 2 as the medium in which the cosmos arises it is quite
452
Mr Lewes doctrine of the social medium
472
98
476
In fact he ignores the distinction between succession of feelings
477
Of this the key lies in his doctrine of the real What then
489
Why nevertheless common sense identifies the real with the
498
Lockes proof of the real existence of
500

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 168 - For my part, when I enter most intimately into what I call myself, I always stumble on some particular perception or other, of heat or cold, light or shade, love or hatred, pain or pleasure. I never can catch myself 'at any time without a perception, and never can observe anything but the perception.
Page 293 - The comparison of the theatre must not mislead us. They are the successive perceptions only, that constitute the mind ; nor have we the most distant notion of the place where these scenes are represented, or of the materials of which it is composed.
Page 257 - As to the first question, we may observe that what we call a mind is nothing but a heap or collection of different perceptions, united together by certain relations, and supposed, though falsely, to be endowed with a perfect simplicity and identity.
Page 107 - The understanding seems to me not to have the least glimmering of any ideas which it doth not receive from one of these two. External objects furnish the mind with the ideas of sensible qualities, which are all those different perceptions they produce in us; and the mind furnishes the understanding with ideas of its own operations.
Page 32 - When therefore we quit particulars, the generals that rest are only creatures of our own making, their general nature being nothing but the capacity they are put into by the understanding of signifying or representing many particulars. For the signification they have is nothing but a relation that by the mind of man is added to them.
Page 136 - The ideas of Sense are more strong, lively, and distinct than those of the Imagination; they have likewise a steadiness, order, and coherence, and are not excited at random, as those which are the effects of human wills often are, but in a regular train or series — the admirable connexion whereof sufficiently testifies the wisdom and benevolence of its Author.
Page 346 - Reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions, and can never pretend to any other office than to serve and obey them.
Page 31 - ... ideas are general when they are set up as the representatives of many particular things : but universality belongs not to things themselves, which are all of them particular in their existence, even those words and ideas which in their signification are general.
Page 62 - Words become general by being made the signs of general ideas; and ideas become general by separating from them the circumstances of time and place and any other ideas that may determine them to this or that particular existence. By this way of abstraction they are made capable of representing more individuals than one: each of which, having in it a conformity to that abstract idea, is (as we call it) of that sort.
Page 27 - I have said, not imagining how these simple ideas can subsist by themselves, we accustom ourselves to suppose some substratum wherein they do subsist, and from which they do result ; which therefore we call

Bibliographic information