| United States. Supreme Court - Courts - 1980 - 790 pages
...provisions of § 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment." Ibid. (Citation omitted.) And we went on to hold: "Congress may, in determining what is 'appropriate...constitutionally impermissible in other contexts." Ibid. Then, in Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Services, supra, decided only weeks ago, we... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - Courts - 1988 - 970 pages
...Government does not obtain. "Congress may, in determining what is 'appropri234 Opinion of the Court ate legislation' for the purpose of enforcing the provisions...constitutionally impermissible in other contexts." Fitzpatrick, 427 US, at 456. In view of this fact, it is incumbent upon the federal courts to be certain... | |
| Edward S. Corwin, Harold William Chase, Craig R. Ducat - History - 1978 - 694 pages
...constitutional Amendment whose other sections by their own terms embody limitations on state authority. We think that Congress may, in determining what is...which are constitutionally impermissible in other contexts."22 The Ih. "College of Electors" So-called AMENDMENT XII The electors shall meet in their... | |
| Ila Jeanne Sensenich - Convicts - 1979 - 526 pages
...enforce by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article." The court stated in Fitzpatrick : We think that Congress may, in determining what is...constitutionally impermissible in other contexts. 427 US at 459, 96 S.Ct. at 267l, 49 L.Ed.2d at 622. Although Fitzpatrick was a Title VII action, the First Circuit... | |
| |