 That every receiver or manager of any property appointed by any court of the United States may be sued in respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with such property, without the previous leave of the court in which...  Reports of Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana - Page 336by Indiana. Supreme Court, Charles Frederick Remy, George Washington Self, Philip Zoercher, William H. Adams, Mrs. Edward Franklin White, Emma Mary May - 1911Full view - About this book
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - Law reports, digests, etc - 1909 - 796 pages
...would be bound to do if in possession ;" also " that every receiver * * * may be sued in respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with such property, without the previous leave of the court in which such receiver * * * Was appointed." It is not disputed... | |
 | Law - 1888 - 564 pages
...bound to do if in possession. Section 3 allows suit to be brought against a receiver in respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with the property in his charge, without the previous leave of the court which appointed him; such suit... | |
 | American Bar Association - Law - 1887 - 460 pages
...bound to do if in possession. Section 3 allows suit to be brought against a receiver in respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with the property in his charge without the previous leave of the court which appointed him ; such suit... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1895 - 2084 pages
...or manager of any property, appointed by any court of the United states, may be sued in respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with such property, without the previous leave of the court in which such receiver or manager was appointed ; but such... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1905 - 1124 pages
...by the act of 1887-88, is untenable. His refusal to accede to the demands of appellant was not "an act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with such property in his custody," but was simply a refusal on his part to permit another to acquire title to a portion... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1901 - 958 pages
...receiver or manager of any property appointed by any court of the United States may be sued in respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with such property, without the previous leave of the court in which such receiver or manager was appointed; but such suit... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1892 - 1066 pages
...there Is not. The act of March 3, 1887, declares that "every receiver * * * may be sued In respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with such property, without the previous leave of the court In which said receiver or manager was appointed." We agree... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1899 - 962 pages
...receiver or manager of any property appointed by any court of the United States may be sued In respect of any act or transaction of his In carrying on the business connected with such property, without the previous leave of the court in which such receiver or manager was appointed; but such suit... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1898 - 1134 pages
...receiver or manager of any property appointed by any court of the United States, may be sued in respect to any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with such property, without the previous leave of the court in which such receiver or manager was appointed; but such suit... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1894 - 782 pages
...Stat. 433, c. 866, every receiver, appointed by a court of the United States, may be sued in respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with the property, without the previous leave of the court by which such receiver was appointed. Necessarily,... | |
| |
