Rationality and the Good: Critical Essays on the Ethics and Epistemology of Robert AudiMark Timmons, John Greco, Alfred R. Mele For over thirty years, Robert Audi has produced important work in ethics, epistemology, and the theory of action. This volume features thirteen new critical essays on Audi by a distinguished group of authors: Fred Adams, William Alston, Laurence BonJour, Roger Crisp, Elizabeth Fricker, Bernard Gert, Thomas Hurka, Hugh McCann, Al Mele, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Raimo Tuomela, Candace Vogler, and Timothy Williamson. Audi's introductory essay provides a thematic overview interconnecting his views in ethics, epistemology, and philosophy of action. The volume concludes with his comprehensive response essay that yields an illuminating dialog with all his critics and often extends his previous work. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 28
Page 4
... inferential belief formation that is more automatic than what we usually call inference.2 Beliefs may produce others without our focusing on premises or drawing conclusions. The plurality of superstructures is indefinitely rich. There ...
... inferential belief formation that is more automatic than what we usually call inference.2 Beliefs may produce others without our focusing on premises or drawing conclusions. The plurality of superstructures is indefinitely rich. There ...
Page 12
... inferential process, even when based on other beliefs.28 And reasonable action need not be rea- soned action. It need not be based on practical reasoning. The rationality and rea- sonableness of beliefs, desires, or actions depend on ...
... inferential process, even when based on other beliefs.28 And reasonable action need not be rea- soned action. It need not be based on practical reasoning. The rationality and rea- sonableness of beliefs, desires, or actions depend on ...
Page 13
... inferential beliefs. This distinction is made and elaborated in “Structural Justification,” Journal of Philosophical Research 24 (1991): 473–92, reprinted in The Structure of Justification (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993) ...
... inferential beliefs. This distinction is made and elaborated in “Structural Justification,” Journal of Philosophical Research 24 (1991): 473–92, reprinted in The Structure of Justification (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993) ...
Page 19
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
Page 20
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
Contents
| 3 | |
| 17 | |
Knowledge Justification and Acceptance | 83 |
Intention SelfDeception and Reasons for Action | 141 |
Reason and Intuition in Thought and Action | 199 |
Index | 263 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
A-ing acceptance agent argued attitude Audi’s basis Capgras delusion categorical imperative causal claim cognitive concept conclusion of reflection condition consider deceiving delusion delusional delusional jealousy depends discussion entail epistemic epistemology ethical ethical intuitionism example explain external facie duties false formulation ground I-mode imply inference inferential intention internalist intuitionist joint justified belief justified in believing K-Nec Kant Kant’s Kantian kind knowledge KPNDS least material objects McCann Mele middle axiom moral intuitionism moral intuitions moral judgment moral principles motivational narrow content nondoxastic noninferential normative notion obligation one’s perceptual beliefs Philosophical plausible pools of water positive prima facie duties promise properties propositional attitude question rational person reasons for action relevant requires rience Robert Audi role Ross Ross’s Rossian seems self-deception self-evident sense social someone Sri Lanka suggests testimony theory things tion treat Trincomalee true truth trying Tuomela Twin Oscar we-mode