Page images
PDF
EPUB

nesia with the formation of a very insoluble magnesian silicate; and I have found that by boiling the artificial hydrocarbonate of magnesia with a solution of silicate of soda, this salt may be completely decomposed with the formation of carbonate of soda and an insoluble silicate of magnesia which gelatinizes with acids*.

We may then suppose in the recent mineral waters the presence of silicates and bicarbonates of soda, lime and magnesia; but on boiling, the earthy carbonates are precipitated (with some silicate), while the dissolved silicates of lime and soda are slowly decomposed as the liquid evaporates by the carbonate of magnesia, with formation of carbonates of soda and lime, and silicate of magnesia, until the whole of the silicic acid is removed from the solution. The organic acids of the river-waters do not play any important part in these reactions, for the same phænomena are observed in the waters of alkaline springs which contain only insignificant traces of organic matters. It is worthy of remark, that in these waters the amount of carbonic acid is not nearly sufficient to form bicarbonates with the lime, magnesia, and soda uncombined with sulphuric acid or chlorine. And I have suggested, in my analysis of the Caledonia springs, that the magnesia and soda are present as a double carbonate, whose existence in a dilute solution seems compatible with a dissolved silicatet.

The comparison of the two river-waters whose analysis we have just given, shows the following differences:-The water of the Ottawa, containing little more than one-third as much solid matter as the St. Lawrence, is impregnated with a much larger proportion of organic matter derived from vegetable decomposition, and a larger amount of alkalies uncombined with chlorine or sulphuric acid. Of the alkalies in the state of chlorides, the potassium salt in the Ottawa constitutes 32 per cent., and in the St. Lawrence only 15 per cent.; while in the former the silica equals 34, and in the latter 23 per cent. of the ignited residue.

The Ottawa river drains a region of crystalline rocks, and the alkalies liberated by the decomposition of the felspars of these rocks give their character to its waters; the extensive vegetable decomposition evidenced by the organic matters in solution must also contribute a portion of potash; while the basins of the great lakes through which the St. Lawrence flows are excavated in palæozoic strata which abound in limestones rich in salt and gypsum, and have given to the water of this river that predomi

p.

* See also Kuhlmann, Comptes Rendus de l'Acad. December 3, 1855, 981, "On the Decomposition of Alkaline Silicates by Chalk."

† Geological Survey Report, 1848, pp. 146, 147. Ditto, 1851, p. 52. Ditto, 1852, p. 115. Ditto, 1853, p. 155. Also Comptes Rendus de l'Acad. August 20, 1855.

nance of soda, sulphuric acid, and chlorine, which distinguishes it from the Ottawa. It is an interesting geographical feature of these two rivers, that they each pass through a series of great lakes in which the waters are enabled to deposit their mechanical impurities, and thus are rendered remarkably clear and transparent.

The presence of large amounts of silica in river-waters is a fact but recently established. Until the late analyses by H. St.-Claire Deville of the rivers of France*, the silica in water had generally been overlooked wholly or in great part; and, as he suggests, had, from the mode of analysis, been confounded with gypsum. (The purity of the silica in all my determinations was established by the blowpipe.) The importance in an agricultural point of view of this large amount of dissolved silica, where river-waters are employed for the irrigation of the land, is very great and geologically, the fact is not less significant, as it marks a decomposition of the siliceous rocks by the action of waters holding in solution carbonic acid, and the organic acids arising from the decay of vegetable matters, which, dissolving the alkalies, the lime and magnesia, from the native silicates, liberate the silicic acid in a soluble form. Silica is never wanting in natural waters, whether neutral or alkaline, although proportionally less abundant in neutral waters which contain large amounts of earthy ingredients. The alumina, whose presence is not less constant, although in much smaller quantity, appears equally to belong to the soluble constituents of the waters. The amount of dissolved silica annually carried to the sea by the rivers must very great; yet sea-water, according to Forchammer, does not contain any considerable quantity in solution; it doubtless goes to form the shields of Infusoria, and may play an important part in the consolidation of the ocean sediments and the silification of organic remains.

be

Montreal, March 1, 1857.

IT

XXXVII. On a Problem in the Partition of Numbers.
By A. CAYLEY, Esq.†

T is required to find the number of partitions into a given number of parts, such that the first part is unity, and that

no part is greater than twice the preceding part.

Commencing to form the partitions in question, these are 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 &c.;

1 2 1 1 2 2 2 2

1 2 1 2 3 4

* Annales de Chimie et de Physique, 1848, vol. xxiii. p. 32.
† Communicated by the Author.

and if we were to proceed to the 4-partitions, each 3-partition ending in 1 would give rise to two such partitions; each 3-partition ending in 2 to four such partitions; each 3-partition ending in 3 to six such partitions; and each 3-partition ending in 4 to eight such partitions. We form in this manner the Table

Ending in

Number of 1|2|3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10111213141516

Totals.

1-partitions. 1

2-partitions. 1 1

3-partitions. 2 2 1 1

4-partitions. 6 6 4 4 2 2 1 1

120080

6

26

5-partitions. 2626 2020 141410 10 6 6 4 4 2 2 1 1 166

&c.

And we are thus led to the series

1

1, 2

1, 2, 4, 6

1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 20, 26

&c.;

where, considering O as the first term of each series, the first differences of any series are the terms twice repeated of the next preceding series: thus the differences of the fourth series are 1, 1, 2, 2, 4, 4, 6, 6. It is moreover clear that the first half of each series is precisely the series which immediately precedes it. We need, in fact, only consider a single infinite series, 1, 2, 4, 6, &c. It is to be remarked, moreover, that in the column of totals, the total of any line is precisely the first number in the next succeeding line.

Consider in general a series A, B, C, D, E, &c., and a series A', B', C', D', E', &c. derived from it as follows:

[blocks in formation]

A' + B'x+C'x2+&c. =(1+2x+2x2 + .....)(A+Bx2+Cx1+&c.)

[blocks in formation]

And if we form in a similar manner A", B", C", D", &c. from A', B', C', D', &c. and so on, we have

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

and so on. Write A=1, and suppose that the process is repeated an indefinite number of times, we have

[blocks in formation]

which gives rise to the following very simple algorithm for the calculation of the coefficients :

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0, 0; 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 16, 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 16, 20, 25, 0, 0, 0, 0; 1, 2, 4, 6, 10,

10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 20, 25, 30, 36, 42, 49, 56 30, 36, 42, 49, 56, 64, 72 14, 20, 26, 35, 44, 56, 68

1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 20, 26, 35, 44, 56, 68, 84, 100, 120, 140 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0; 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 20, 26 1|2|4, 6|10, 14, 20, 26 36, 46, 60, 74, 94, 114, 140, 166|

&c.

The last line is marked off into periods of (reckoning from the beginning) 1, 2, 4, 8, &c.; and by what has preceded, the series which gives the number of 1-partitions, 2-partitions, 3-partitions, &c. is found by summing to the end of each period and doubling the results; we thus, in fact, obtain (1), 2, 6, 26, 166, 1626, &c. and the same series is also given by means of the last terms of the several periods.

The preceding expression for 1+Bx+Cx2+ &c. shows that B, C, &c. are the number of partitions of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, &c. respectively into the parts 1, 1', 2, 4, 8, &c. and we are thus led to

Theorem. The number of x-partitions (first part unity, no part

greater than twice the preceding one) is equal to the number of partitions of 2-1 into the parts 1, 1', 2, 4, ... 23. Or, again, it is equal to twice the sum of the number of partitions of 0, 1, 2, ... 2-2-1 respectively into the parts 1, 1, 2, 4, ... 2*-3 (where the number of partitions of O counts for 1).

For example, the partitions of 0, 1, 2, 3, &c. with the parts 2, ... are

1, 1′,

(.)

1, l'

1+1, 1+1′, l'+1', 2

1+1+1, 1+1+1', 1+1′+1', l'+1'+1', 2+1, 2+1', the numbers of which are 1, 2, 4, 6. Hence, by the first part of the theorem, the number of 3-partitions is 6, and by the second part of the theorem, the number of 4-partitions is

2 Stone Buildings,

March 17, 1857.

2(1+2+4+6)=26.

XXXVIII. On the Connexion of Catalytic Phænomena with Allotropy. By C. S. SCHÖNBEIN*.

THE number of the phænomena hitherto made known which have been named catalytic, or actions by contact, has already become tolerably large, and will daily increase. Both Berzelius, who was the first to direct attention to these enigmatical phænomena, and Mitscherlich, who has also devoted much time to their investigation, have carefully abstained from expressing even an opinion as to their ultimate cause. For if the one used the word "Catalysis," and the other the expression "Action by contact," neither, if I have rightly understood them, considered these terms to imply any explanation. A peculiar class of facts was to be briefly distinguished; and if these names have been misused in science, these illustrious inquirers are certainly not to blame.

I am of opinion that the time is now come when many of the catalytic phænomena may be better understood than hitherto; that is, may be referred to another series of facts which have been made known within the last few years. I allude to the remarkable capacity which many simple bodies possess of undergoing, under the influence of imponderable and ponderable agents, essential changes in the complex whole of their properties. This kind of material change Berzelius has distinguished

* Translated by Dr. E. Atkinson from Poggendorff's Annalen, vol. c. p. 1.

« PreviousContinue »