Page images
PDF
EPUB

Of those Notes peculiar to this edition, I have to regret the not having, in due time, adopted a uniform mode of designation. Some of them have a date, or imply a reference to time; others are included in brackets; and to others, the words Fourth Edition are prefixed.

I should feel it not becoming to relate the expressions of approbation with which this book has been favoured by eminent men of science, in our own country and in the North American States; or, what is a more exalted gratification, the testimonies of usefulness in relation to its religious element. But it would be a failing to the great cause for which I plead, if I did not avail myself of a communication which, to well-informed persons, will have the appropriate interest in a very high degree. It is a part of a letter with which SIR JOHN HERSCHEL honoured me in the summer of 1843.

[ocr errors]

Abstractedly, one might have thought that such wild and 'vehement denunciations' as those you cite from **** and others, were hardly worth very seriously handling. Yet, in effect, I am disposed to regard it as doing good service not only to science but to religion and moral feeling, to put down, as you havẹ done, with a strong (though not a cruel) hand, that sort of barking and yelping. There cannot be two truths in contradiction to one another: and a man must have a mind fitted neither for scientific nor for religious truth, whose religion can be disturbed by geology, or whose geology can be distorted from its character of an inductive science, by a determination to accommodate its

results to preconceived interpretations of the Mosaic cosmogony.

"I should hope that, on this painful and troublesome point, your work will prove final, and put an end, once and for ever, to the sort of outcry in question; or at least so far crush it, that this and the next generation may be allowed to pursue their geological researches in peace."

[ocr errors]

It is my duty to add that these citations from private letters are thus made public, with the kind assent of the writers.

HOMERTON COLLEGE,
February 5, 1848.

J. P. S.

CONTENTS.

ROMANS XI. 36. Of HIM, and through HIM, and to HIM, are all things :

to whom be glory for ever.

Recital of opinions which are by many assumed to be asserted or
implied in the Scriptures, but which are contrary to geological doc-
trines. I. The recent creation of the world. II. A previous uni-
versal chaos over the earth. III. The creation of the heavenly bodies
after that of the earth. IV. The derivation of all vegetables and
animals from one centre of creation. V. That the inferior animals
were not subject to death till the fall of man.

GENESIS VI. 17. And behold I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon ·

the earth, to destroy all flesh wherein is the breath of life from under

heaven: and every thing that is in the earth shall die.

Continuation of apparent discrepancies between geological doc-
trines and the testimony of Scripture, as generally understood. VI.
Concerning the deluge. The reason for that judicial infliction, in
the righteous government of God. The testimony of history and
tradition. Common ascription of geological phænomena to the
Deluge erroneous.

2 PETER II. 5. God spared not the old world,-bringing the flood upon

the world of the ungodly.

Continuation. More accurate and discriminating inquiry. Inves-
tigation of the masses of rolled stony fragments which have been
attributed to the diluvial action. Those masses found to be of dif-
ferent character and age. Effect of the investigation upon the con-
victions of the most eminent geologists. Evidence from phænomena
in Auvergne and Languedoc. The quantity of water requisite for a
deluge geographically universal. The effect of such an addition to
the bulk of the earth. The reception of animals in the ark. Esti-
mated number of the animal creation. Other difficulties.

1 THESSALONIANS V. 21. Prove all things: hold fast that which is

good.

Examinations of various methods which have been proposed for
the removal of the difficulties and alleged contradiction, between
Geology and the Scriptures. I. Denial of any difficulty, by shutting
the eyes to the evidence of geological facts, and representing the in-
quiry as impious.

Examination continued of the Diluvial Theory.

« PreviousContinue »